As the high-profile federal trial of music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs edges toward its final act, prosecutors have unexpectedly dropped several charges, narrowing the focus of what has already been an intense legal battle.
In a letter filed on June 24, the prosecution announced it would no longer pursue charges tied to attempted kidnapping, attempted arson, and aiding and abetting sex trafficking. The move, according to court documents, was part of an effort to simplify jury instructions as both sides prepare for closing arguments.
“The Government understands the Court’s desire for streamlined instructions,” the letter read. “Accordingly, we have removed instructions regarding attempted kidnapping under California and New York law, attempted arson under California law, and aiding and abetting sex trafficking.” With that, the charges were effectively dropped, leaving fewer allegations for the jury to consider.
This decision came the same day both sides rested their cases, following six weeks of often emotional and heated courtroom testimony. In a strategic move, Diddy’s defense team did not call any witnesses but instead leaned on evidence and cross-examinations to argue that the prosecution’s case was riddled with contradictions and insufficient proof.
Alexandra Shapiro, one of Combs’ lead attorneys, made a strong pitch for the court to dismiss the case altogether, filing a motion for judgment of acquittal. “There’s, at best, thin proof any of the other employees participated,” she argued, adding pointedly, “There is no evidence any of them believed he was sex trafficking.”
With jury instructions expected to be finalized on Wednesday, June 25, both legal teams are gearing up for closing arguments, which will span Thursday and Friday. If the schedule holds, jury deliberations could begin as early as Monday, June 30.
The case has drawn national attention, not only due to Combs’ celebrity status but because of the serious nature of the charges and the broader implications for accountability in the entertainment industry. Regardless of the trial’s outcome, it marks a pivotal moment in a career once defined by musical milestones, now shadowed by courtroom scrutiny.
For now, the eyes of the public and the justice system, remain fixed on what the jury will decide.
